Starmer told reporters that Britain remains “steadfast in its alliances” but must act in its national interest. Economists say diversification of trade partnerships is a key pillar of the government’s growth agenda.

Political debate in Westminster continues, with lawmakers weighing economic benefits against strategic concerns.

The restrictions had been imposed amid diplomatic tensions in recent years. British officials welcomed the development, calling it a positive step toward rebuilding trust.

Human rights groups cautioned that broader issues remain unresolved, but diplomats described the announcement as symbolically significant.

Home Office officials said the decision reflects growing concerns about alleged overseas activities linked to the group.

If approved, the ban would criminalise membership, fundraising, and public support within the UK.

Civil liberties groups cautioned against unintended legal consequences, while security experts said the move would strengthen counter-terrorism tools.

Parliament is expected to debate the proposal in the coming weeks.

The comments were quickly rebuffed by British officials, who said the UK would not outsource its foreign policy decisions.

The exchange highlights growing transatlantic differences over how Western nations should approach Beijing.

Diplomats said the remarks could complicate coordination among allies already facing multiple global crises.

The agreement focuses on intelligence sharing and financial tracking, according to officials familiar with the talks.

Human rights groups urged transparency, warning that enforcement efforts must protect vulnerable migrants.

The UK government said the initiative complements existing European partnerships.

Officials insist national security protections remain intact as discussions continue.

Government officials say the strategy is rooted in realism, economic necessity, and alliance management.

As global competition deepens, the UK’s balancing act is likely to remain under scrutiny both at home and abroad.